Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:
edgeos



Bugtraq: Re: New Whitepaper: Anti Brute Force Resource Metering

Re: New Whitepaper: Anti Brute Force Resource Metering

From: Joachim Schipper <j.schipper_at_math.uu.nl>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 00:07:25 +0100

On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 07:33:40PM -0000, Jason W wrote:
>
> >Resource metering through client-side computationally intensive "electronic
> >payments" can provide an alternative strategy in defending against brute
> >force guessing attacks.
>
> The first question I had was,
> Why not just use a turing test. It's simple and, theoretically, only humans can distinguish the passphrase. It requires much less overhead. Obviously this would be used in addition to a password. That's my two cents.

True, but this is not foolproof. If you work hard enough, you can get a
program to recognize text in an image, even if some lines are crossed
in-between. Other 'Turing tests' have similar practical problems,
requiring either a human to check the response (which in practice means
a human adds a decidedly finite amount of possibilities into the
application) or being solvable by a good coder with nothing better to
do (which is a pretty accurate description of a hacker, come to think of
it... ;-) )

Of course, one might use these two together - the above might cost
enough computing power to qualify as 'electronic payment'...

                Joachim
Received on Mar 25 2005

[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
edgeos