Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:
edgeos



Bugtraq: Re: Security Flaw with Digital signatures in Microsoft Outlook

Re: Security Flaw with Digital signatures in Microsoft Outlook

From: Anthony G. Atkielski <anthony_at_atkielski.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 22:20:27 +0100

Roberto writes:

> This 3rd email is yet another variation showing how a digitally
> signed email can further be forget without Outlook ever raising
> warning flags (follow the hyperlinks for the email's source):

Digitally-signed messages cannot be forged. However, only the body of a
digitally-signed message is actually included in the text covered by the
signature; the headers are excluded. That's not an Outlook
idiosyncrasy, it's just the way signed e-mail works.

In every screenshot you provide, Outlook correctly identifies the party
that created the digital signature. That's what a security-conscious
user will check. And the text of the message has not been changed, so
the signature is still valid, and no forgery has occurred.

I'm afraid I don't see any problem here. Yes, it's inconvenient that
one can forge the "From" line of a message, but in secure e-mail, one
doesn't rely on the "From" line, anyway, precisely because it can be so
easily forged. I suppose it might be nice if Outlook made the
discrepancy between the "From" line and the signer's authenticated
identity a bit more obvious, but that's not a security breach, just an
ergonomic issue.

--
Anthony
Received on Mar 27 2005
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
edgeos