Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:
edgeos



Penetration Testing: RE: How secure are dongles for copy-protection?

RE: How secure are dongles for copy-protection?

From: Jonah Kowall <jkowall_at_psteering.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 22:01:43 -0400

Although they are quite secure, many hackers can easily make dongle
emulators for various packages (or crack out the dongle checks
themselves). Some skill is required, but many crackers acqure the
development kit, which allows the debugging and reverse engineer of any
commercially availible dongle package.


        -----Original Message-----
        From: Harold Thimm
        Sent: Mon 6/4/2001 3:43 PM
        To: pen-test_at_securityfocus.com
        Cc:
        Subject: How secure are dongles for copy-protection?
        
        
        I'm looking for any information on incorporating dongles into a
software package for copy protection. In particular, I'm looking for
information on the Rainbow Technologies Sentinel, but advice on
dongle-based copy protection in general is appreciated.
         
        How easy/difficult is it to break this kind of copy-protection?
Are there any known weaknesses in the dongle-type systems themselves (as
opposed to implementation weaknesses?)
         
        Are there any dongle-based protection schemes that have been
cracked, and if so, how? (A pointer to a URL would be appreciated, if
you have it.)
         
        Thanks in advance.
         
        HAL

  _____

        Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
http://explorer.msn.com
        

        

Received on Jun 05 2001
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
edgeos