Well my understanding was that you'd install the program just on 1
server..right? And have people logging in to that server? Obviously
Terminal services licenses would be required but is it the same for
Office and Adobe as well? My bad if I'm wrong :( . The cheaper point
wasn't the crux of what I was trying to say though...
Arvind
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 4:34 AM, Sean Tindall
<sean_at_bulletproofnetworks.ca> wrote:
> Except that to remain license compliant you need to ensure all of your
> users have licenses for those applications anyway.
>
> What you think terminal services or citrix is a CHEAPER solution than
> deploying apps to desktops? Only on REALLY large scales, and site
> licenses for these apps are still required.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> Hey Paul,
> Things like Citrix work exactly like this. So that way you do not have
> to install programs on each and every user workstation; in this case
> Office and Adobe possibly primarily because licenses are costly.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This list is sponsored by: Cenzic
>
> Need to secure your web apps NOW?
> Cenzic finds more, "real" vulnerabilities fast.
> Click to try it, buy it or download a solution FREE today!
>
> http://www.cenzic.com/downloads
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is sponsored by: Cenzic
Need to secure your web apps NOW?
Cenzic finds more, "real" vulnerabilities fast.
Click to try it, buy it or download a solution FREE today!
http://www.cenzic.com/downloads
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on May 01 2008