Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:
edgeos



Politech: FC: More on Ashcroft's press conference, wiretapping, and MATA bill

FC: More on Ashcroft's press conference, wiretapping, and MATA bill

From: Declan McCullagh <declan_at_well.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 00:47:37 -0400

Previous message:
http://www.politechbot.com/p-02526.html

Text of the draft "Mobilization Against Terrorism Act", which one
politechnical says is now already out of date:
http://www.wartimeliberty.com/article.pl?sid=01/09/20/0333204

*********

Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 12:44:41 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jack Reed <jr0280_at_albany.edu>
To: Declan McCullagh <declan_at_well.com>
Subject: Re: FC: Transcript of Ashcroft-Mueller 9/17 remarks on wiretap bill
In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.0.20010918111419.020a5150_at_mail.well.com>

   Declan,

   You may have already received this information, but some of the expanded
wiretapping capability that Ashcroft is seeking is already available.
Specifically, the ability to target a person rather than a telephone
number was written into law in ECPA and further modified in 1998. Here's
an excerpt from the 2000 Wiretap Report (p. 9):

   Since the enactment of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of
   1986, a specific location need not be cited in a federal application if
   the application contains a statement explaining why such specification
   is not practical or shows "a purpose, on the part of that person (under
   investigation), to thwart interception by changing facilities (see 18
   U.S.C. 2518 (11)). In these cass, prosecutors use "roving" wiretaps to
   target a specific person rather than a specific telephone location. The
   Intelligence Authorization Act of 1999, enacted on October 20, 1998,
   amended 18 U.S.C. 2518 (11)(b) so that a specific facility need not be
   cited "if there is probable cause to believe that actions by the person
   under investigation could have the effect of thwarting interception from
   a specified facility."...

   For 2000, authorizations for 27 wiretaps indicated approval with a
   relaxed specification order under 18 U.S.C. 2518(11).

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/2518.html

   Sec. 2518. Procedure for interception of wire, oral, or electronic
communications

   Keep up the good work
   Jack Reed

--
E-mail: jr0280_at_cnsunix.albany.edu
Voice: (518) 442-5609
FAX:   (518) 442-5716
School of Criminal Justice
University at Albany
135 Western Ave.
Albany, NY 12222
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/
To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Sep 20 2001
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
edgeos